Traffic Shaping on TMNET Streamyx?

Everywhere I see people complaining that their Internet access speed via TMNET Streamyx is slow, and there are accusations that TMNET is using traffic shaping technology to limit bandwidth for certain applications. I don’t know how true are these, and have never bothered to check.

However lately I have been experiencing very slow Bittorrent traffic, as you can see from the table below. October traffic is much worse. I don’t really care too much as long as web browsing and POP traffic is fine. So far everything else seems fine but connections to GMail via POP3S / HTTP sometimes chokes.

While I know it is not valid (legally and morally) for me to complaint about slow P2P or bittorrent traffic, this is just an example of how slow things are becoming.

August
September
Day
Outgoing MB
Incoming MB
Totals
Outgoing MB
Incoming MB
Totals
1
3397.6
2111.7
5509.3
2115.7
1321.8
3437.5
2
3136
1350.8
4486.8
2249.1
222.6
2471.7
3
3941.8
3239.6
7181.4
2570.1
1472.4
4042.4
4
3990.9
2352.5
6343.4
2447.6
3151
5598.5
5
3745.7
384.9
4130.6
2218.6
692.2
2910.8
6
3944.5
553.7
4498.2
1951.5
1666.9
3618.3
7
3969.4
836.9
4806.3
2485.3
1615
4100.2
8
3690.5
331.3
4021.9
2594.9
483.2
3078.1
9
3494.3
1153.2
4647.5
2754.2
911.8
3666
10
3332.9
680.5
4013.5
1979.2
1764.2
3743.4
11
3569.7
1801.5
5371.2
1752
777.2
2529.3
12
3693.2
5103.8
8797
988
255.2
1243.2
13
1476.2
3140.6
4616.8
1406.5
784.9
2191.4
14
3727
3272.3
6999.4
1459.8
211.8
1671.5
15
3740
3970.2
7710.2
1393.3
449.6
1842.9
16
3125.8
2780
5905.8
1443.7
397.3
1840.9
17
3151.6
1864
5015.6
1238.8
1774.7
3013.5
18
2158.1
6072.7
8230.9
1327.8
2465.5
3793.3
19
2077
6462.9
8539.9
1654.6
422.9
2077.5
20
1840.2
5045
6885.2
1628.3
741.9
2370.2
21
2014.2
5440.4
7454.6
1001.7
1339
2340.7
22
2151.6
2312
4463.6
874.3
908.2
1782.5
23
1864.6
2069.8
3934.4
1474.1
1133.6
2607.7
24
1843.1
1472.5
3315.6
954.8
735.6
1690.4
25
2235.3
1022.7
3258
887.9
563.4
1451.3
26
2241.9
2720.2
4962
705.6
459.2
1164.8
27
1899.7
259.3
2159
345.7
245.9
591.6
28
2173.6
1051.7
3225.3
567.4
197.3
764.7
29
2110.8
2146.8
4257.6
398.5
138.8
537.3
30
2597.5
2089.1
4686.6
475.2
833.1
1308.2
31
2308.3
524.3
2832.5
88643.2
73616.8
162260.1 MB
(158.5 GB)
45343.9
28136
73479.9 MB
(71.8 GB)

The table above is combined from 2 tables produced by trafvol.pl script downloaded from the Internet sometime ago. Measurements are taken only on the eth1 interface of my torrent box, which is the external interface connected to the router. Traffic above includes web traffic as the box is also running squid serving 4 PCs in my home.

I think October results will be much lower, as can be seen below the daily traffic passing through is less than 1GB (compare this to August and September daily values).

Day Month Outgoing MB Incoming MB Totals
1 Oct 308.7 525.1 833.8
2 Oct 321.6 268.4 589.9
Month Oct 630.2 793.5 1423.7 MB (1.4 GB)
statistics last updated at 18:35:02 on 02. Oct 2006

I’m too tired to rant anymore, so from now on I’ll just see what happens, while praying that a miracle would happen and the Government will realize that if TM monopoly to the Internet goes on, their IT-vision for Malaysia is just a dream. Angan-angan Mat Jenin.

0 Shares

4 thoughts on “Traffic Shaping on TMNET Streamyx?”

  1. i just have streamyx today and i notice bittorrent is very suspicious slow.. compare to my existing time.net webbit.. streamyx p2p is totally hopeless

    after few blogs i pretty sure tm is doing something bad behind.. they probably had installed Deep Packet Inspection (DPI) hardware to throttle p2p.. DPI is capbale to block today p2p entirely regardless encryted or not..

  2. antiDPI,

    I agree 100%. When encryption is enabled, I don’t really see any improvements to my BT traffic. It more or less stays the same. So far I have never heard of any DPI device that can see through encrypted BT traffic, and I wonder if TMNET is taking this matter so seriously that they have implemented something like Allot Communications NetEnforcer which claims that it can inspect throught encrypted bittorrent traffic.

    Why did you switch to Streamyx? For most of us, we don’t have any other options…

  3. Pingback: [ mkhairul.com ]
  4. It has been the same for me, bt progressively getting slower & I thought it was my com’s setting that had gone wrong =.=
    No matter what I did the download speed just hover around 15kbps.
    They’re plainly just wasting our electricity, what else have they achieved? Web pages does not load any faster than before, neither does anything else differ from the past except slow p2p.

Comments are closed.